Видео

Do you mean once you have completed your registry for 10 years, THEN you can have your name off the registry, or you can petition to have it removed by showing that you are compliant with your registry regardless or meeting the 10 year period or not? What if someone was wrongfully convicted?

They tried to get it without my consent 🙃

Will you go home after the first court date?

Every lawyer I’ve spoken with wants a minimum of $2500

"Any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void." Justice Marshall overturned the law enacted by Congress and signed by the President in Marbury v Madison 18😮05 5US (Cranch) 137, 161, 167. But the know the judges of our country know this ruling. They dont care. I guess judging is not their responsibility.

(((judnich))) ... anyone that would defend a pedo is a pedo.

He’s right

Land of the Free, Land of the Free, Land of the Free............not

so much for not being compelled to be a witness against yourself. For those of you STILL too clueless to comprehend, this is EXACTLY what a POLICE STATE looks like

who pays for it?

If the cops get a warrant for a (dui/dwi)blood test how many attempts does the cop or phlebotomist get? My arms(and legs) are full of scar tissue and to get a blood test(physicals) requires them to put me under and go through my neck. Sometimes they can go through my fingers with pediatric butterflies. Trying the normal antecubital or other large veins is very painful and almost never works. I have a medical issue with vein and artery walls prone to rolling and/or rupturing...I dont drink or do drugs so it might never be an issue, but Im wondering(and Im in Billings).

1st

1st

1st

This is evil and why a lawyer could not beat this I have no idea I blame the attorneys they're the ones that can make a difference

I hope you can answer my question. I live in california, and as a teen, I was a ward of the court. So I received a letter from the D.O.J, and it says I'm a prohibited person until I turn 30 years of age. I'll be turning 30 in August. My question is, when I turn 30, will it automatically fix itself, or is there a process I need to do?

What about a certificate of relief from civil disabilities

How do I call you?

The local court told me you can only expunge misdemeanors under Montana state law. True?

The thousands of people who cannot own a gun because of a past criminal record is insane. I was convicted in 1991 of a felony but after my release from prison in 1995 I haven't even recieve so much as a speeding ticket. Why after 27 years of living a moral life can I not legally posses a gun or rifle? I think I paid my dues both with my incarceration and my time as a productive citizen. When can common sense laws be enacted that allows citizens to regain their constitutional rights? Am I a second class citizen in my own country who doesn't deserve to live a free and constitutional available life?

Is there a way to check and see if my rights have been restored….? I was convicted (plead) in Kansas in 2010 of non-violent, non-person level 3 drug felony, and as of last year, the ban was for 10-years, and late last year, the law (at least in Kansas), was changed to only 8 years; My fear is this: I’m thinking I’m in the clear since Kansas restores civil rights automatically after 10 years (now 8 years) from release of jurisdiction aka release from probation. Yet, I still show a felony on my record. So my worst fear is trying to follow the law, to legally attempt to purchase a weapon legally; and the NICS system flag me and get my door kicked and hauled off to prison, either for saying I “lied” on a federal form, where it mentions then”convicted of a felony”, because since its not expunged, the felony DOES still stand-yet-Kansas automatically restores civil rights, I’ve already been pulled for jury duty twice in the past year. How do I know if my rights have been restored without risking it ALL….? Thanks in advance!

I don't know where to begin! First of all, I don't know HOW this can be LEGAL. There is NO getting around the constitution. As a healthcare provider for over thirty years in the Operating Room, I'd like to offer some food for thought here. A judge can grant warrants ALL DAY LONG. But if your officer brings a DUI suspect to me for a blood draw, I will first ASK for consent from the subject. If he says no, my job ENDS right then and there, which is probably a reason why law enforcement has just decided to take it upon themselves to 'circumvent' patient/citizen rights. I took an oath to be an advocate for the CITIZEN. As a health care professional, I know when a citizen enters the hospital, they are issued a pamphlet informing them of their rights. These rights are contrived from the United States Constitution. I cannot draw blood or take a blood pressure UNLESS I have consent to do so, otherwise by definition of law, I have committed aggravated assault with an injurious weapon. (Yes, I said weapon, because there exists a number of law enforcement officers who would assert a feather could be a deadly weapon) For argument's sake, lets assume the officer is granted a warrant to obtain a blood draw on a subject suspected of a DUI. The results of that blood draw are protected by the HIPPA laws, therefore the blood draw is unconstitutional and the test results are not admissible, having been UNLAWFULLY obtained. This also points to circumventing constitutional rights of the people. Ya can't have it both ways folks. Either HIPPA protects health information or it doesn't. You can't say it does over THERE,,,,but not over here. You can bend it, twist it, put some torque on it, rephrase it, take exception with it or flat out ignore it --- BUT WE THE PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS! You CANNOT take an instrument and put it into the human body against their will -- warrant, judge and law enforcement be damned! Second of all....I would not trust law enforcement as far as I could throw them. If they will plant drugs etc to make an arrest, how EASY it would be to molest a test result. I just saw a video of a DWI arrest where the officer drew the blood -- HORRIBLE technique and a total disregard for asepsis and sterility! The fact is --- law enforcement needs to leave medical procedures to the professional in that field. I could list a MILLION reasons why, all of them scary. A blood draw is a simple thing....most of the time unless you accidently hit an artery instead of a vein. I hope they know which is which. Who do I need to contact to raise some hell about this OVERREACH of government practice?! This is a case of government CRIMINALLY violating federal LAW and making us believe "oh...it's totally legal"...NO IT IS NOT! Remember the RN working the emergency room in Utah? The officers were pestering her to death wanting the blood/drug/alcohol results. This RN, like me KNEW the law and understood that if she revealed the test results, she could very well have the State Board of Nursing in Utah, permanently pull her license! It's against the LAW! But law enforcement do not know the law and so they went so far as to manhandle her, hand cuff her and put her into a police car! In conclusion --- a MEDICAL DOCTOR must write an order for a procedure to be done, is the judge practicing medicine without a license??? Are these guys being evaluated during these draws? Do police have their body cams on while drawing blood? I could go on...forever....this is BAD MEDICINE...all the way around. And I'm pretty sure when they were being taught how to venapuncture, no one told them about practice insurance. Typical. They instruct law enforcement to draw blood, and the cop doesn't know anything about events that can occur during venapuncture. There is liability here for law enforcement officers they know nothing of! Dear Jesus. This is worse than I thought!

black and red note. black note because it takes away my hope and identity red note because it take away my pride.

Can the president of the United States give you your gun rights back?

the violent registry , unreal

i have a misdemeanor in MA for Assault and battery, did not use any weapons or anything dangerous. the police charged me with a felony in the beginning of everything but ended up pleading guilty to misdemeanor in MA, would i be good to go to get a firearm?

Please help, I live in Ohio and I got a minor misdemeanor possession of marijuana and a possession of drug paraphernalia charge when I was a kid, (I was pulled over with a marijuana pipe in the car and it had some burnt marijuana residue in it) at the time I was 17 and was charge as a adult because my 18th birthday was in a couple months, I'm assuming anyway.. but I got probation and paid the fees and fines for it completed the probation and left that mistake in the past and haven't smoked anymore since. My question would be would those 2 charges make it to where I have a firearm disability? I'm looking into getting a handgun for my home and have it for protection in case the worst case scenario ever happened and I would need to defend myself. For the life of me I can't find out if Since I got these 2 convictions as a teenager, if they would prevent me from ever legally being able to lawfully possess or OWN a firearm? I'm a law abiding citizen and wanted to get a absolute yes or no before I looked further into purchasing a pistol for home defense only. If I'm able to, I would eventually pursue a CCW license as well, but I needed to know first if I was even lawfully able to own a firearm let alone conceal carry one. I'm now 33 years old, have had no other criminal charges whatsoever (other than a DUI I got 12years ago, and traffic tickets). I'm just trying to get a simple understanding if I'm allowed to OWN a pistol at home without a CCW or gun permit.. Everything I'm seeing isnt a straight cut answer... which is what I'm looking for. It just says "felony" drug conviction punishable by a year imprisonment would give me a disability to purchase or own a firearm, which mine WASN'T and was a minor misdemeanor for possession of marijuana, along with a misdemeanor for drug paraphernalia (marijuana pipe). Please let me know my options and if I'm ok to own one even if it's privately purchased and kept it at home? I'm not getting a clear cut answer and can't find a yes or no from the guidelines set by Ohio on a state or federal level to own a firearm... Or from anyone else I've asked for that matter. What I'm gathering is the state of ohio would consider it a disability and I would be able to purchase one, but that I couldnt CARRY one as far as a CCW, but that I could buy and OWN one legally, I basically can't carry it? But federally I would be okay to purchase or carry. If this is true would it still apply when constitutional carry goes into effect in my state in a couple months? I'd be interested in carry after a little more time with one and when I build my comfort level with it. But again idk as I'm not getting a clear cut answer, this is just what I've gathered on my own research. Is this true? Please help as I need to get one for personal reasons and need to get this figured out immediately. Thank you for your time

If they commit another offense, they should get a life sentence.

Thank You for your Extremely Informative Videos. You seem to be Brilliant Attorneys. I would like to see VIDEOS THAT ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS, and I would greatly appreciate it if you would please answer the following questions. My Private Attorney seems to be a Lazy Negligent Incompetent Attorney. I had NO PRIORS, so I had no prior experience with Attorneys. I would like to know what constitutes a Good Private Attorney? In particular, what constitutes a Good Private Criminal Defense Attorney? Under what circumstances should you Fire your Private Criminal Defense Attorney? What would YOU do if you had a Criminal Defense Attorney such as mine? I would like to know what to do to build a Case for Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel now while I am still a Pre-Trial Defendant? My Private Criminal Defense Attorney is so Bad, that I’m thinking about just going with a Public Defender; what constitutes a Good Public Defender? I have a Private Criminal Defense Attorney who: 1)Is so DISORGANIZED that he CANNOT FIND the WRITTEN FACTS OF MY CASE even after dozens and dozens of hours of looking for the Document, such that now the Document is essentially lost. I remembered the Facts when the Document was written, but now I do not remember many of the Important Facts. And of course my lazy Attorney does NOT remember the Facts either. Isn’t an Attorney supposed to be Organized and Easily Find the Written Facts of his Client’s Case? 2)One of my Attorneys Took Notes and Wrote my initial Statement Of Facts regarding my Case, but after that Attorney left the Organization, my present Private Attorney Lazily REFUSED TO TAKE ANY NOTES about the remaining FACTS OF MY CASE. And when at my request my Attorney came to see me to hear me talk about the remaining FACTS OF MY CASE, my Attorney lazily REFUSED TO TAKE NOTES, saying that he would Remember everything I said; then later HE FORGOT MOST OF WHAT I HAD SAID. Also regarding the Appointments to hear the remaining Facts Of my Case, my Attorney arrived Late, took a Long Lunch, and Left Early to go Play Basketball, etc.; he was Extremely Well-Paid for all of that. Isn’t an Attorney supposed to Take Detailed Notes regarding the Facts of his Client’s Case? 3)I had a WILLING CRUCIAL WITNESS whom MY ATTORNEY REFUSED TO BOTHER TO INTERVIEW, and he even Refused to take her Contact Information. Isn’t an Attorney supposed to Interview and keep Contact Information regarding Crucial Witnesses? 4)Without my permission or knowledge MY ATTORNEY PUT MY DIARIES ON THE PUBLIC RECORD,. Right after my Attorney put my Diaries on the Public Record I told him to immediately Remove them, but he Refused. Now myriad People Hate Me because of things in the Diaries, and they have made Threats to Harm Me and Other People mentioned in the Diaries. My Attorney says he can't Remove My Diaries from the Public Record without permission from the Prosecutor, and my Attorney says we have to give the Prosecutor extraordinarily good reasons to Remove the Diaries. Isn’t it a Violation of Attorney-Client Privilege for an Attorney to place a Client’s Documents on the Public Record without permission from the Client? If an Attorney places Documents in the Court File, can’t he remove those Documents unilaterally without the Prosecutor agreeing to that removal? 5)It seems that my Attorney engaged in IMPROPER BILLING. My Attorney charged my Parents Exorbitant Amounts Of Money to Represent me, and my Attorney told my Parents he needed Money to do things on my Case at the same time my Attorney was telling me that he was NOT doing anything on my Case. What should be done regarding an Attorney who Improperly Bills? 6)My Attorney told me he could get me a PLEA BARGAIN which seemed like a really good Plea Bargain to me, but he tried to Dissuade me from taking a PLEA BARGAIN. Then later he said he would NOT be able to get a Plea Bargain; he seems to want to go to Trial, and I think it is just that he will get a lot more Money from a Trial. Do Attorneys typically get more Money from a Trial as opposed to a Plea Bargain? 7)Generally my Attorney DOES NOT COMMUNICATE with me. Generally my Attorney says he does NOT read my Mail, read my Email, nor listen to my Voice Mail. What should be done regarding an Attorney who Refuses to Communicate with his Client?

How about you all pull your head out of your ass before you get in trouble in the first place. Don't get into any domestic dispute, or get a DUI. Having some scumbag attorney get you out of trouble after the fact shows that both the client and the attorney are both scumbags. People who society shouldn't want in it. Getting arrested isn't normal, breaking the law isn't ok. These defense attorneys have put more scumbags back out on the streets for the rest of society to deal with until their next arrests. Be a good citizen and you have no worries about losing your gun Rights.

Fun fact .. shall not be infringed! Fu*k the bullsh*t!

What about felony convictions in Montana can the also be expunged after a certain amount of time?

What about In Tennessee?

DO YOU WANT TO LOSE YOUR GUNS? IF YOU VOTE FOR REPUBLICAN'TS, YOU'LL LOSE YOUR GUNS VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS 2022 AND SAVE YOUR GUNS How is this possible? Here's how: Texas GOP passed an anti-abortion law that allows average citizens to sue anyone involved in an abortion performed in Texas... the doctors, nurses, admin people, etc etc... VIGILANTE LAWS... This concept goes far beyond abortion.. California will now pass a similar law regarding YOUR GUNS. Any citizen of California can sue anyone involved with a gun that has committed a crime involved in a gun accident. For example: If a person is murdered with a gun or a child or any person is killed or injured in a gun accident, then any citizen of CA can sue the gun manufacturer, the store that sold the gun, the ammo manufacturer, the trucker that transported the gun to the gun store... etc etc etc..... THE KEY HERE IS THE GUN AND AMMO MAKERS... THEY WILL GO BANKRUPT WITH ALL THE LAWSUITS... Other blue states will enact these same gun vigilante laws and that will be the end of guns in America. If you like this idea of TAKING YOUR GUNS AWAY then vote for REPUBLICAN'TS BECAUSE THEY CAN'T GOVERN FOR THE PEOPLE.... VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS AND SAVE YOUR GUN RIGHTS AND SAVE ABORTION RIGHTS. Republican'ts are the ones who have enacted these "vigilante laws" .. .what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

It’s sickening than they can forcibly do this.

If you have criminal convictions the best way to get your gun rights back is by sticking your gun into your mouth then all you have to do is pull the trigger

Shall not infringe. All gun laws restricting people are unconstituional. Its a God given right not given to me by man.

Get my rights back ....help me sir

Yeah,you cannot Assault an Supreme members and say they cannot own a fire arm, when supreme law of the land says they can own,carry,And Return Fire when Fired. Upon,State, Federal, Has no,No Jurisdictions to Disarmed An United States Main battle force members,Nor any members Who Served under the Supreme law of the land,Nor who is connected to the Harry STruman law, Treason war crimes are being used against me....State feds, don't have jurisdictions,There must be A Military Tribunal Trial under law.

You don't restore something that clearly states it cannot be infringed upon, if a cop or tyrant tries to infringe on your rights give them the bullets that's why we are where we are today we keep asking permission for rights by going to people like this guy that just sucks your wallet dry while he knows dang well once you lose them you can't get them back on how the federal law is written so just give them the bullets much easier and less costly.

Excuse me judnich law firm ....if my rights are "GOD-GIVEN AND UNALIENABLE RIGHTS TO LIFE , LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS" BASED UPON LEGAL SPEAK ! WHICH IS NOT OPEN TO INTERPRETATION AND THE SCOTUS HAS RULED SINCE THE EARLY 1900'S THAT THE CITIZEN HAS THE SACRED RIGHT TO FREE TRAVEL AND SPECIFICALLY RULED THAT NO STATE , NO GOVT, COUNTY, MUNICIPALITY CAN CONVERT A " GOD-GIVEN AND UNALIENABLE RIGHT, TO A PRIVELEDGE THEN MAKE IT A CRIME ......THE CONSTITUTIONAL TESTS USED BY THE SCOTUS APPLY TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS ALSO .....IF THESE RIGHTS ARE " GOD-GIVEN AND UNALIENABLE RIGHTS "....THEN NOT EVEN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS ANY AUTHORITY TO CONVERT A RIGHT INTO A PRIVELEDGE THEN MAKE IT A CRIME BY DISCRIMINATING CERTIAN AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO ARE STILL LEGAL CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA... LEGAL QUESTION 1) WHEN DID THE "GOD" THAT TGE FRAMERS SPOKE OF PRESENT HIM/ HERSELF BEFORE ANY COURT, LEGISLATOR , CONGRESS OR JURY AND STATE AS A WITNESS BEFORE ANY COURT THAT " GOD" NO HAS DECIDED TO GIVE HIS/ HER AUTHORITY TO ANY SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL, ESSENTIALLY MAKING SAID PERSON A " DEMI- GOD " WHO NOW HAS ALL LEGAL AUTHORITY TO ACT AS " GODS " REPRESENTATIVE AS EVIDENCED BY A WITNESSED AND SIGNED CONTRACT WHICH IS A LEGAL BINDING CONTRACT PRESENTED AT ANY TIME ANY WHERE IN ANY LEGAL COMMON LAW COURT, MARITIME COURT, ADMIRALTY COURT , THAT SCOTUS HAS UPHELD AND RULED UPON DECLARING IT A RULING AND CONTROLLING CASE TO BE CITED THUS GIVING A SPECIFIED LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE ALMIGHTY "GOD" HIM/HERSELF HAS LEGALLY GIVEN THE ANGELIC AND SUPERNATURAL ABILITY ,LEGAL BINDING AUTHORITY OVER ANOTHER CITIZEN WHO IN THAT SAME PRE AMBLE AND CONSTITUTION "FOR " THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1776 CLEARLY STATES THEREIN ...." THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL" ??? PERIOD ....THIS IS THE MOST BASIC BITCH COMMON SENSE QUESTION THAT I AM THROWING IN YOUR FACE........EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE HOW IF ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL HOW DOES ANY OTHER EQUALLY CREATED MAN , ASSERT THAT THEY HAVE THE "GOD GIVEN AUTHORITY TO ARBITRARILY DECIDE THAT THEY NOW SOMEHOW , CAN DECIDE GOD WASWRONG WHEN I WAS BORN WITH THE GOD GIVEN AND UNALIENABLE RIGHTS TO LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS???? THIS IS NOT ONLY A CHALLENGE TO YOUR LAW FIRM BUT EVEN ALLEN DERSHOWITZ....BARRISTERS , THE CORRUPT UNITED STATES BAR ASSOCIATION .......BEN FRANKLIN WAS CORRECT IN HIS STATEMENT THAT ALL LAWYERS SHOULD BE SHOT...LAWYERS ARE PART OF THE EVIL RACKET THAT SEEK TO ENSLAVE , AND DOMINATE CITIZENS DESTROYING THEIR ABILITY TO EXPERIENCE LIFE , LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS

Mr Judnich .....does the pre-amble to the bill of rights ,THE CONSTITUTION "FOR " THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1776 , ILL PARAPHRASE, ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL AND ARE BORN WITH CERTIAN GOD-GIVEN AND UNALIENABLE RIGHTS???????

RIP HUEY HAHA

Maybe you should answer some of these comments

Just the easiest way for them to take weapons ....... The difference between a subject and a citizen is the ability to defend yourself from the government

No way are you ever going to get that right back

You'll never get that done right back ever unless you are convicted of jaywalking

My felony is from California...recieving stolen property...a motorcycle....how much does it cost

The conversation went, "we are only successful 50% of the time, but that will be $900 flat rate"......

What can be done for felony charges?